As I skimmed through this article I was reminded of the reality of biometrics. It is a statistical algorithm designed to compare what was registered to that was just sensed. It is an imprecise process. The author reminds us of the importance of our identity in each and every interaction we engage in. She further ponders the question, of the potential threats to the biometric solutions that countries, people and enterprises are embracing, as we work to address the questions of Authentication and Identification in our complex digital and physical world.
The article asks the questions:
- Do the countries and enterprises understand the technology and processes used to support biometrics as a means of authentication.
- Do they appreciate the need to secure and protect this most sensitive of data?
- Is the data they store able to be used to compromise the individual of the integrity of that which it seeks to protect?
- Are we at risk of creating a surveillance society?
Finally there is the question of the accuracy of biometric matching. It is interesting to observe the comparison of the accuracy of biometric matching to PIN or password matching. We all recognize the challenges of PIN and password. It is not the concept it is the question of how many complex PIN or passwords is the human mind capable of retaining without writing them down or storing them someplace that can be compromised.
As I have argued in other blogs, the answer must be in the possess of something unique which has a False Reject Rate FRR and a False Accept FAR Rate, both approaching zero. Clearly the PIN or password has such a characteristic the challenge is in remembering so many. An object or a thing “Something You Have”, be it a card, phone, watch or bracelet with a Restricted Operating Environment inside e.g. secure element, TEE or TPM, secured using strong cryptography, paired with a biometric makes the most sense.
As I sat to write, I was drawn to the Wikipedia’ Bitcoin article. As I read the story of how it all happened memories and concerns once again flowed through the neurons of my mind. Silk Road and their involvement and the evolution of the value of a Bitcoin, struck me as a magical mystery tour through a world of mathematicians, anarchists, profiteers and speculators.
I then remember reading
an element of a report from the Bank of International Settlement on crypto currency. The picture above is intriguing for those of us who appreciate the complexity of payments. The article gets ever so intriguing when one continues to read and finds this interesting illustration of
the difference between what we all are familiar with and what those who understand DLT and Bitcoin appreciate. The central focus of this new technology is to address one and only one concern. Trust in the intermediary.
I must admit this particular article is not the one I originally intended to speak to. I do though recommend reading it.
The article I had intended to reflect on is Central Bank Cryptocurrencies. In this document they speak to the possibility of the banks issuing a stablecoin. The recent announcement of JPMorgan Chase is one example of such.
This then causes me to reflect on the various use cases and conversations with people about the potential of DLT. I wonder why, at least here in the USA with our judicial and regulatory framework and the rule of law; we would seek to replace the existing intermediaries with a permissionless distributed ledger and the associated consensus mechanisms of a public ledger. There is enormous and growing cost in consensus built on “Proof of Work” and massive duplication of the ledger or as most call it the chain. Be it the electrical cost, the cost of a data center or the specialized computers necessary. The people and companies, the nodes and miners, will expect a reward for their effort.
Which is cheaper, if a reasonable level of trust exists?
Where are we going from here
This is the question. There are those that believe Block-chain and all of the other distributed ledger technologies are the answer to everything. I would suggest one much consider:
- The level of trust the various parties have in each other.
- The cost of multiple copies of the distributed ledger.
- The cost of the consensus mechanism versus a trusted intermediary.
- The governance required to maintain security, software and specifications.
- The value and ethical issues of anonymity.
This then begs the question of a permissioned or a permissionless ledger. Which then begs the question of governance and who is responsible to establish the rules.
It is clear there is value in the idea of a distributed ledger. I would suggest caution in deciding if it makes sense for your use case.
- What are the goals and objectives of the solution?
- What are the economics of the various approaches?
- Who are the stakeholders?
- Who determines the rules and manages change?
- Can the participants trust an intermediary?
- Does everyone fear what another could do?
Helping you to understand the answers to these questions is what we do.
NYTimes: As Facebook Raised a Privacy Wall, It Carved an Opening for Tech Giants
As Facebook Raised a Privacy Wall, It Carved an Opening for Tech Giants https://nyti.ms/2GqnbC9
As I read this article my mind asked the question what drives an organization and its American employees to forget they are American citizen’s with responsibilities to protect this nation from the acts of our enemies.
Excess profits, what other motivation could there be. The one motivation which is and will remain the greatest threat to society, the environment and our grandchildrens’ future.
Be it the concentration of power which drives excess profits or the reduction of quality, weight, volume or size, simply to maintain price and margin the shareholder will be served after senior management take its plenty. Stakeholders – client and employees come second, after the key executive and strategic shareholders are rewarded.
Russian’s and our other enemies will find our weaknesses and take advantage deluding us with propaganda and lies, all to achieve their aims.
Often times people speak of disruption as this traumatic thing being imposed upon them, their industry or society. Yet, if we look under the covers disruption more than likely is all about a competitor, not locked into a legacy approach, approaching the market with different tools.
The world of payments, as so many others, have implemented technology then gone on to enhance or update multiple times. Each time, someone or some group of people, had to adapt therefore invest to keep up. More often than not, a community would decide to hold on to what they built, sometime ago, hoping no one tried to disrupt the status quo.
With payment, the need to embrace more effective approaches parallels the robustness and frequency of transactions. It also parallels the desire of sellers to do business with anonymous buyers. A lack of trust and a need to reduce the amount of cash we carry drove markets to promissory notes. These promissory notes further evolved, as trusted intermediaries entered the market and created more efficient methods of providing that guarantee of payment. If you are still a little in the dark about what these are, you can Google questions such as “what is a promissory note?” “What are the elements of a promissory note?”, etc. so you are fully up-to-date with the information that you need.
Not wanting to duplicate what is already written about the history of money and payments we can jump forward through the paper phase to where we are in North America: Cash, cards, some checks and electronic debits & credits.
If we look inside the evolution of legacy. We find what we have, is a stumbling block, holding innovation back. We need to decide to adapt what exists or remove and replace.
Today I read Karen Augustine’s Mobile Payments Use in the U.S. Lags
As I read and reflected on what Karen wrote, I reflected on my experiences as a sagged payment consultant and executive, with international experience.
What I see is an issue of legacy and muscle memory – setting a pattern for the future. Said another way – our history defines the boundaries of our future.
Asia did not have electronic payments. I am sure did not want to embrace the globally dominate American solution. Therefore, they had the opportunity to start fresh. It is very much like what Spain went through, went they moved from cash to electronic card-based payments. They bypassed the check.
Her article brings back memories of life in Belgium in the 90’s. Writing a check was a rare occurrence. Direct debit mandates, a MisterCash card and a Eurocard was all we needed to buy and enjoy life. Electronic payments was the norm, paper checks were a rare oddity and cash, well yes there was a very present grey economy.
Here in the USA we developed our payment systems off the back of regional or state banks with acceptance networks limited to a local domain. Moving to a national system required early adoption of a common national currency. We then went on to replace IOUs with paper checks and store cards with credit cards. In time we enhances the ACH system and developed support for remote deposit and check capture.
Why do we need to move the card into the wallet? Why change habits that are comfortable and work? Most of us drive to shop and therefore must have our drivers license. We must carry a physical document with us. We simply carry two or more ID-1 sized cards.
You make the statement and was once again reminded of times past.
“… universal mobile wallets and more often driven from merchant based applications that often incorporate loyalty and rewards, which to date still remain nascent in universal mobile wallets.”
When I produced this rendering, back in 1996, I was on stage talking about a world where leather and technology converged. I imaged Bluetooth, NFC, secure elements, GPS and our various credentials converging into this personal device. Those credentials grouped into: travel, identity, membership, loyalty and payments; easy to find and present.
When contactless payments were introduced, in 2004, by Visa’s with PayWave and MasterCard’s PayPass; I argued why contactless cards – how can the issuer afford the extra dollar per card (cost of the antenna and inlay) and the merchant the extra 60 dollars to enable the NFC reader? The way Issuer income works, “Interchange”, the consumer would need to spend more on that issuer’s card. For the merchant to justify the necessary POS investment, meant the retailer believed the consumers would spend more, because it was “easier”. Was Tap To Pay going to make me spend more. Maybe for small ticket purchases, I may use cash less; but at the merchants expense! We argued the cost of cash was more than the Merchant Discount. Some agreed. Many wondered what the blank are they trying to sell us!
Around the same time America was exploring this contactless experience, the European Payment Council and GSMA debated and ultimately offered an approach for mobile card based contactless payments https://www.europeanpaymentscouncil.eu/sites/default/files/KB/files/EPC220-08-EPC-GSMA-TSM-WP-V1.pdf . Handset manufactures like Nokia had already added NFC Antenna’s to their mobile phones and mobile network operators, the MNO, saw the SIM as the secure element capable of holding payment credentials.
Some tried, the Trusted Service Manager as a service was developed and deployed. The challenge, the economics of the model. In this case the MNO saw revenue and wanted to charge fees to load the payment credential into the phone and better yet charge rent to store these payment cards in our phones. Again I ask the question, by changing the way we pay, do I cause us to want to spend more? I think not!
Maybe some would argue, with a credit card people am able to buy things today that they cannot afford. Let them end up in debt. This is true. But then is debt at 18% a good thing? Europeans simply decided to establish a line of credit, as a feature of a Current Account, at reasonable interest rates.
We could go on and talk about how Apple saw the possibility of a 0.15% income stream from ApplePay based mobile payments and how the EMVCo tokenization framework evolved to support their desire to protect the Apple Brand.
What is clear, we could solve George’s problem and replace his Full Grain Vegetable Tanned Cow Leather leather wallet with a Mobile Wallet managed by Apple, Google, Samsung or …
Or, we could think about the consumer and what they really want?
As your article made clear, and so many others have shared, Asia leaped forward. Be it AliPay or WeChat, the device, the mobile phone, became the consumers wallet, their method of engaging, shopping, learning and exploring.
We need to accept to simply replace what we are comfortable with, with something new; which does not enhance our experience, is simply not worth it!
Many of us, like Karen, would argue the experience of shopping is what the mobile phone can enhance and let the act of payment become the afterthought. A simple click to say – yes, I agree to pay.
Amazon got it right with One Click. Others, as the patent expires, are embracing the same technique to simplify payment to a friction-less act of satisfaction. When my favorite stores offer me an mobile app designed to enhance my shopping experience, to thrill me with offers and entice me with things I want; then yes I will become more loyal, I will shop at their store more frequently and maybe even buy a few things I did not intend to buy.
Many years ago while attending conference of groceries in Abu Dhabi – one of the speakers share an experience. when that supermarket executive instructed each store to put the beer across from the diapers, the intended result occurred. The husband, sent to get the diapers, ended up buying a six pack too.
Maybe, like this experience reveals, if we focus on the consumer experience and on delighting them. They will embrace change.
If there is no value why should we?
Years ago I prepared and published an idea. I called it Cando. I was still committed to the idea of the mobile wallet. I was an early adopter of the smart phone and saw its potential.
Yesterday over a lunch I ended up synthesizing my thoughts into a neat little package that I would like to start sharing.
Those who extoll the virtues of Block Chain speak of:
- Immutability – Cryptographers and mathematicians will prove the immutability of the algorithms, at least for now
- Distributed – as long as there a multiple diverse and competing stakeholders this is great
- Trustless – I keep asking the same question Who defines the content of the Block or the ledger or the transaction? Everyone ultimately agrees a body of people and I sit there and say that sounds like a governance model. Be it a currency, a ledger, a contract two or more must agree to structure format, content and rules.
- Consensus – Great as long as we never exceed the 51% participation by A party, the model is superb.
I then think about Work and the reward
Be it Proof of Work or Proof of Stake the entities that do the work are intermediaries and will want to be rewarded for their work.
Then one must think about shifting from a solution that rewards someone with a coin to a system that rewards someone with a fee earned.
I then reflect on Bit Coin and its use of Proof of Work
Coins are created by the party who figured out the Nonce, as a reward for solving the cryptographic puzzle.
- Once they earned 25 Bitcoins
- Today they earn 12.5 Bitcoins
- At some point, in the future, the reward will be cut in half and then half again
As the chain gets longer the work gets harder
As time moves forward and the number of coins in circulation grows
The reward decreases in notation value.
Sounds like inflation is built in.
Real estate, computers and electricity cost money.
As the work expands the costs increases!
There is inherent Inflation built into the Bit Coin Model.
We simply replace intermediaries with Nodes and Miners.
We require a governance model so we simply change the governor to another.
People will want to be paid for the work they do to build the block or assure consensus of the chain
What is truly revolutionary?
The math, ok maybe.
Immutability, it is done today with cryptography, without a block chain.
Multiple copies of the ledger spread around the world. Yes, as long as we address confidentiality.
We have governance, sure we can always elect a new government
What is so magical?
Identifier – Something you create or are provided to digitally identify yourselves. Identifiers are things like an alias, user name, email address are examples.
Identity – This is who we are or wish to represent ourselves to be. These are attributes and information about: where we live, who we work for, which banks we have relationships with, who our friends are, which clubs we belong to, our certified skills, what schools we graduated from, which country(s) we are citizens of, our LinkedIn profile, Our Twitter handle, our Facebook identifier, our phone number … . It is the sum of the attributes we can and will share with others, be they individuals, governments, entities or organizations; as we establish relationships and prove to them who and often what we are.
Authentication – The method we employ to assure that you, based on the identifier presented, are who we (the relying parties) thinks you are. You are the person the relying party accepted when you registered that Identifier as how you would digitally identify yourself. By itself the method of authentication should not allow another party to be able to determine anything about your identity. Privacy is the goal. FIDO Alliance and W3C have defined standards to support authentication.
Verification – The process of confirming that the secret or biometric match the secret or biometric that where originally registered to that Identifier.
Identification – A means of authentication that is bound to your identity. A EMV payment instrument “Chip and PIN”, a PIV card, an electronic passport, a membership card, a drivers license, a national ID are all forms of identification issued by a party that should be trusted to have performed a proof of the individuals Identity, based on a defined and often published criteria.
This particular word, for many, has an alternate meaning. In the biometric community they see Identification as the ability to use a biometric to determine ones Identity. This is achieved by performing a one (the person present) to many match (persons registered). The goal is the same, bind Identity to the mean of Authentication by using the Biometric as the Identifier.
Proof – The method a relying party or an individual uses to validate your claim of a specific Identity. In many cases this is achieved by relying on knowledge of another party. The relying party accepts the due diligence to proof your claimed identity was done to their satisfaction by another party. This other party is often referred to as a Trusted party. This effort to proof the identity of an individual is linked to words and acronyms like KYC “Know Your Customer”, ID&V “Identity and Verification” and Self Sovereign Identity. We classically assume that documents provided by a Government e.g. drivers License and Passports are a solid proof of the claims asserted on those same documents.
In a digital world this is the most important element of a how we as people, entities, governments and corporations can be assured that you are who we believe you to be.
I am once again am reminded of the 1994 New Yorker Cartoon
A new term was added to my learning today The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Better said the age of Disruption.
Is the common man able to embrace the change ahead. Yes, those of us who have the education, the experience and the desire to embrace change; can fathom this new world. What of those that live in the middle – what happens to them in this new age
Then in this weeks issue of the economic
An interesting thought – Is the USA behind in adopting payment technologies.
Areas that one could ponder are:
* Payment Card Security
* P2P Mobile Payments
* P2P and P2B Electronic Funds Transfer as part of Home/Mobile Banking
* Elimination of Checks including Check images
* A/R and A/P electronic payments integration
What would be interesting is to eventually be able to catalog the global differences and define the ultimate payment capabilities a country should adopt.
Please let’s share and explore.
Today I was confronted with volatility. In a two week period gas prices had gone from 2.395 to 26795, quite a climb of less than 14 days.
Volatility, this is what we must remove from peoples lives. Stability and comfort are what is important. Having gameful activity to allows us to contribute to the whole. Being idle is unproductive and only benefits the traders who prey on short term activity to enjoy profits from volatility.
Our President must accept that the Wall Street lobby must be squelched for a while as volatility is banded from the marketplace. This will take an acceptance on the part of the wealthy that they cannot take it beyond the grave and before that excessive income is not acceptable to the healthy grow of civilization.
Set a maximum salary of say 2 million.
Foreign exchange markets are another area of concern. Volatility based on war and famine must the mitigated out of the civilization.
Our civilization is global and provisional limitations such as food subsidies need to be removed.
Remember they are simply subsidies paid by the tax payer. Government should be limited to a percent of the population; remembering its role is to only assure the the primitive functions of justice, liberty, freedom and security.
Regulation is something that must be removed and a new form of peer review established with responsibility to maintain quality, service, stewardship for the planet, and a judicious use of nature resources. Free enterprise is encouraged by remembering that it is the relationship between the customer and proffer that ultimately decides success.
In a paper recently published by the Federal Reserve they begin to consider what actions the FRB should take to drive the further adoption of P2P electronic payments and the reduction in paper checks.
Their introduction speaks to the differences in adoption of electronic payments in the USA and Europe. Intriguingly they include privacy concerns as a key issue. This being said, having lived in Europe for 15 years, I am not sure the desire for privacy is greater in America. What can be said is that the moment when the underlining infrastructure was developed defines the ideas and feature sets. Newer systems learned grew as other economies embraced and proved the viability of innovative ideas.
They go on to discuss the fate of eCash (Mondex, VisaCash) and the need to create ubiquity in order to assure success. Clearly, as they outline, the major adoption issue in the field of payments is achieving a density of merchants willing to accept a particular means of payment and simultaneously demonstrating a significant number of consumers willing to employ said means of payment.
Unfortunately for the inventors of neat solutions the reality is that without figuring out how to assure ubiquity the new idea they will not be a success. If we look at contactless, MasterCard clearly recognised this reality and funded the initial investment in equipment. Without this investment one wonders if PayPass would have reached the low levels it has.
The interesting thought that emerges from this paper is that the wide spread deployment of mobile phones means that an infrastructure that both merchants and consumers have is in place and if one can find an intuitive means of exploiting this installed base, part of the deployment problem is mitigated.
In my heart, I believe mobile will allow the establishment of new ways of paying, The next question can today’s infrastructure support P2P payment instructions and will the issuers and acquirers figure out how to make money without cannibalizing existing revenue streams.
Posted: 08:44 AM ET
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan predicts U.S. unemployment could hit 10%. Currently the nation’s unemployment rate is at 9.8%.
So, what do you think is most responsible from the worsening employment picture: a failed stimulus package, an economy much worse than we knew, employers cutting deeper and hiring more slowly than expected, or something else all together.
Leave us a comment. We’ll share some of them on air in the CNN Newsroom, 11am ET — 1pm ET
So there we are. A picture and a set of points on why we are where we are with unemployment. Now what about this idea.
First, there is an issue of Greed. A small percentage of the global population has accumulated a massive amount of wealth. I am not here to judge the right or wrong of how they or their ancestors acquired the wealth. I am here to suggest looking forward.
- 100 million dollars a year as a salary to hedge the price of gasoline and contribute to raising the profits and consumer costs associated with oil.
- $17.2 million to successful sell Visa inc, to the market, earning bankers a significant return.
- Numerous excesses that programs like Nip/Tuck mimic for Wall Street millionaires.
- A stock market that has a curve that simply should not have been allowed. Long term prudent economic management is essential.
Ponder this. If equities is suppose to represent the inherent stability of the corporations that employ our neighbors; what happened starting in 2000 and culminating in the bear Stearns collapse in 2007. Is Wall Street unravelling the growth that began in 1982 and went into a hyperactive phase in 1995, and simply correcting itself.
What next should represent a step change in how we think about governance, compensation, risk, responsibility and morality.
What I think a lot of us forget is that our society evolved over millennium and here we are thinking we are so important. What is important, is being faithful to a common morality, and making sure that we leave something better for our children.
I agree with the Dali Lama, all we want is peace and happiness.
So what next?
- Cap salaries for the rich at 2 million per year.
- Institute a managed health system that still uses the concept of insurance and hedging risk to fund our healthcare system.
- Introduce a health management system, with a basement for those that cannot afford even the most basic plan.
- Re-introduce exercise in the school system and subsidize community gyms and recreational facilities.
- Re-introduce the luxury tax for non essentials over $30,000 and on things that are not good for you or are excessive. Say anything not associated with your food, transportation and housing.
- Focus on better educating the family practitioners, gynecologists, internist and pediatricians so that they do a much better triage and assessment of appropriate care given available resources with fear of reprisal for taking risks. If necessary, require an additional year of service at a teaching hospital earning a reasonable income say $120,000.
- Do a lot of what Congress is already talking about
- Strengthen the VA hospital and medical care system
- Do not mess with Medicare or Medicaid, until the new system is in place. Let the people move to the free market approach.
- Do not create a Government run insurance system. Yes to creating a open market, knock down state borders and promote re-introduction of the original Blue Cross Blue Shield concept of a co-operative not for profit solution
- Focus on regulating the quality of care with a no one left behind principle.
- Keep the insurance companies out of setting fees. Manage thje cost of the healthcare system by focusing on competition. The patient is the client and is to be saught after without offensive advertising.
- Mandate a National Id card keying off the social insurance number. Combine it on the Drivers license, as a day one requirement.
- Focus as a corporate priority on employment being the key indicator of success. Begin discussions on Right to Work legislation and stimulating more humane approach to managing down costs in a period of economic recession. Reduce executive wages well before the first person can be let go, without cause.
- Merge all the work in the fields of governance, risk and regulation into a replacement bill.
- I could go on.
Last night, 11 September 2009, I watched hours of material on 9/11.
I saw the planes as the flaming arrow of the False Prophet.
I saw the two towers as the symbol of the moral decay of the False Profit.
Both clashed in a period of 102 minutes we will long remember.
The terrorist is acknowledged and the false prophet stands accused.
Yet the False Profit continues to bring harm to many and shame to those of us who seek to know God and the work Jesus’ expects of us.
When will the False Prophet “Profit” finally be recognized as the work of the devil?
Voices Reflect Rising Sense of Racial Optimism
Geithner, Member and Overseer of Finance Club
I am reading William D. Cohan’s book “House of Cards” and then I read this extremely long article on the Secretary of the Treasury and his culpability!!!! 🙁
As discussed in an earlier post our President says and I quote
“We cannot go back to an economy that is built on a pile of sand — on inflated home prices and maxed-out credit cards, on over leveraged banks and outdated regulations that allowed the recklessness of a few to threaten the prosperity of us all,”
One of the key-members of the executive branch of our Government was sitting in the fortress down on Wall Street, deep into discussions with everyone that mattered and is responsible for the abyss, crisis, depression that has taken the world into uncharted waters.
How can our President, that does not want to “go back to an economy built on a pile of sand, hire, support and continue to seek advice from Mr Geithner. this man was there there, saw the crisis brewing and helped to make it worse. Now we expect the leopard to change his spots and fix it. He had his chance when he was president of the NYC Federal Reserve. If the book I’m reading and this article are accurate he has had his chance and failed.
Please Mr. Obama find someone who is risk adverse, intelligent and not part of the club.
Today in a New York Times Article reviewing President Obama’s press conference, held Wednesday April 30th 2009, he is quoted to have said:
“We cannot go back to an economy that is built on a pile of sand — on inflated home prices and maxed-out credit cards, on over leveraged banks and outdated regulations that allowed the recklessness of a few to threaten the prosperity of us all,”
Reading these words all I can say is YES. Yet, I remain troubled. We’ve all read about the various programs our government is implementing to “fix” our economy. Too often these programs are simply a mechanism to take money from Honest Tax Payers and distribute it to those that over-leveraged themselves and where reckless. President Obama that is not what those word would suggest your policy is.
We seem to think that whatever we do the Government will bail us out.
- Build on the Mississippi flood plane and when the river does what it has always done help those who built where the water has always been supreme.
- Live on the cliffs in California. When the rain comes, and it will, the land will be washed out from under the foundation. Washington will come to the rescue.
- Build on a fault line and when the earth shakes don’t worry too much papa will rescue you.
- Run up your credit card debt, buy a home you can”t afford and daddy will punish the lender and protect the reckless.
- Leverage yourself as Bear Stearns did and we will make it all better
Nature is and has been since God set the universe in motion. Moses in his dialogue with God learned of the beginning and in Genesis he recorded those first days of Adam’s life and how easy it would have been to follow the rules.
The LORD God put the man in the Garden of Eden. He put him there to work its ground and to take care of it.
The LORD God gave the man a command. He said, “You can eat the fruit of any tree that is in the garden. But you must not eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. If you do, you can be sure that you will die.”
He gave us the chance to live in paradise for eternity. He gave us plenty. All he asked is that we work the ground, take care of it and not eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of …
I do not mean to look at original sin nor do I want to talk about how the serpent beguiled woman and man simply ate with her.
What I am concerned with is that Obama is saying all the right things. Yet, when we look to the results we see money flowing into the pockets of those that took us into the abysm. We tell credit card companies that they should reduce interest charges and not protect themselves. We simply seem to be protecting those that are reckless.
So President Obama, please do as you say,
- Don’t bail out the banks and investment company, then let them skirt the rules.
- Don’t fix it so people with maxed out Credit Cards can get themselves back in trouble.
- Don’t help people and mortgage lenders who agreed to mortgages that could not be sustained by the home-owner.
This idea that some companies are just to big to let fail sounds smart. Yet, unless they are also made to appreciate their failings we will simply see it happen all over again.
They personally must feel the pain not simply do as Merrill, AIG and all the CEOs want to and do do, get a government hand out and still get the big bonus. They need to be held accountable and made to put their money where their mistakes are.
G.M.’s Latest Plan Envisions a Much Smaller Automaker
Over the last months countless articles and news commentaries have discussed the plight of the US auto makers. Bankruptcy, restructuring and foreign buyouts are all on the table as the US Government pushes Chrysler and General Motors to fix itself or get fixed.
One item that keeps appearing and as I think back over the last years, starting when Asian auto makers built factories here in America, I am constantly amazed to see that the UAW is not part of the solution. I appreciate that their role is to protect the interests of their members. Yet they simply focus on protecting the lavish pensions (developed when Detroit was ever so profitable) that these individuals are “entitled” to.
I have a profound respect for much of the work the union movement has done to protect the American worker and to assure them that they are paid a fair wage, work in reasonably safe conditions and various other initiatives that escape my mind.
What disturbs me these days is that we complain about Outsourcing and the migration of jobs to India, Malaysia, in years past Ireland and countless other countries willing to work for less than the American worker and do those jobs that are “Beneath Us”. Why we have the human resources, just look at the current rate of unemployment. When it is zero then OK let’s outsource.
As the spokesperson for American workers and hoping they are aware that we cannot practice isolationist policies and impose tariffs and taxes to protect American jobs. I worry that they are not out there working with business and the government to protect those jobs or better yet grow the n umber of jobs while still exploiting the virtues of technology and the goal to reduce the end cost to the consumer, their members.
Instead they slow down progress. They do not take the lead in driving for quality and do not help to make sure what we build or do with American hands and minds is the best that can be made or provided anywhere.
In the article, what I am once again reminded of is the fact that they insist that the “Pensions” be protected 9screw the stockholders and debit holders. i do not see them thinking about the fact that the future of our children is at risk. Jobs will continue to go to where it is less expensive to produce and where equally skilled people demonstrate a willingness to work to put food on their tables.
The unions are one of the great strengths of America. At this time of economic turmoil, where greed is at the core of our housing crisis, the introduction of high risk derivatives and a truly expensive health care system. They should be leading the workforce to understand that the American dream never was intended to guarantee anyone everything and that the American dream was built on hard-work, prudent investment and quality.
If we can return to these roots and focus on quality, hard-work and assuring the future of America for our children, then we will see an upturn in the market and a return to full employment where immigrants are seen as a positive influence and not illegals stealing American jobs.
At the same time Management is equally responsible for our plight. Sub-prime mortgages, derivatives, short sighted corporate planning and yes greed leads them also to be UN-American. They are to focused on the next analyst briefing and their quarterly results and make sure they could sell more for less. So they purchase materials produced by non Americans. They do not insist on an equitable balance between pay, quality and work. Then to make matters worse they insist that they are paid millions of dollars, the Government then bail them out when they make stupid decisions; for what?
We are all in this together and although we know that communism and socialism does not work. Capitalism only works when we do right by everyone and devise a fair distribution of wealth: based on ability, hard work and ingenuity.
Geithner, as Member and Overseer, Forged Ties to Finance Club
Did Timothy Geithner help or assist in bringing Wall Street and the world at large to the brink of disaster? A brilliant man yet was the force of the Wall Street lobby able to easily sway the path of the New York Federal Reserve to allow risk that lead to the collapse.
Morals and a solid foundation of right, wrong and mutual satisfaction must return to the market if it is to be the leader of the world. Has the financial market been seduced by the dark side and falls fowl of the seven deadly sins (Greed, Pride, Sloth, Gluttony, Lust, Wrath and Envy)? They in the end should be the machine that assures liquidity and assures the foundation of our economies ability to grow and prosper. Losing their way and focusing on their personal wants and not the needs of everyone is a disaster worth of the fallen one.
I am happy to see Wall Street and the City of London prosper as long as they remember Jesus’ two commandments and embrace them as part of the principles and goals that drive their actions.
Shortage of Doctors Proves Obstacle to Obama Goals
By ROBERT PEAR 27 April 2007 the New York Times
One proposal — to increase Medicare payments to general practitioners, at the expense of high-paid specialists — has touched off a lobbying fight.
I wonder if Congress should instead focus on improving the income of doctors, reduce the fear of Mal-practive and insisting on deepening their education. So that people will once again see it as a worthy profession and thus there will be enough doctors to serve our growing population, not simply here, but all over the world.
As the Grandson, son and brother of doctors, I am driven to suggest to our Congress and the people that we must consider the investment someone must make to becoming a care practitioner and realize that we must encourage people to want to dedicate the time it takes to become proficient. These dedicated individuals, unlike CEO’s and Wall Street millionaire, must excel in their studies and invest four years at university, four years at medical school and then finally before having the skills to serve us, invest an additional three to six years as a journey man (i.e. their their internship and residency). Hundreds of thousand of dollars later and so much time and study does desire a fair reward.
I also believe that we should begin to think about training our internist better, so they can be more effective and not simply pass the patient on to a specialist. they as the gatekeep should have the education and practical training so unlike today thare are able to properly diagnosis the problem we the sick are facing.
Simply look at the TV series House. his dedication and effectiveness of his team is what we need. People who truly think and only turn to specialists when they fibnally accept that the specialists skills are required. Just to put a value to House. my father a retired Park Avenue and renowned diagnostician finds this one medical program stimulates his thinking.
The other key issue that Obama and Congress must address is that medicine should be a cottage industry. Instead corporations and insurance companies now run our health care system, Hillary Clinton’s efforts, although altruistic, probably drove corporations to seek profits at the expense of the real care-takers and unltimately you and I. These new “medical?” tycoons are more worried about shareholder returns and annual bonuses than the health of the people who should be their focus and are in their care.
Is it a national health system that we need simply to “FIX” the problem. Or is it a return to a system run by doctors who are properly trained and rewarded. We should think first of investing our taxes on helping the gatekeepers (family practitioners, gynecologist and internists) to be the front line, capable of dealing with most medical issues. We should encourage their selfless commitment and drive for education and practical training so they can effectively serve, thus drive down costs by being better at what they do.
Finally thought. Risk is endemic in any system. Lawyers drive risk out of the system by pursuing law suits because someone took at risk or was just like the rest of us a made an error. The net result,t doctors have become overly cautious, dependent on too many tests and unwilling to say this is what I think is wrong and if we don’t do something (however risky) now MY patient will die.